Whether your work involves improving education methods in
public schools or working to limit the proliferation of nuclear weapons, it is
likely that the RAND Corporation has produced a thorough study of the challenges
your work involves and can offer possible solutions to these challenges.
Born out of the Second World War, the RAND Corporation has advised private
companies, organizations, and the United States government on a broad spectrum
of issues, from public health policy to countering the threat of international
terrorism.
History of the RAND
Corporation
The RAND Corporation derives its name from the phrase
“research and development.” RAND was founded in 1948, when a small group of
experts separated from the Douglas Aircraft Corporation. Influenced by the
lessons of World War Two, this small group of experts recognized that continued
world peace was not guaranteed and that supporters of peace had to work
assiduously to promote it. According to its website, the RAND Corporation
is a “nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective
solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors
around the world.” Since its inception, RAND has stressed the need for
cooperation between industries, government agencies, and universities, aiming to
maximize coordination between knowledgeable people to tackle all aspects of a
given issue. In the end, RAND produces what it claims to be thorough and
objective analysis on a wide array of issues. At the same time, many
outside observers question RAND’s relationship with the Pentagon and the
American Department of Defense. Speculation about these connections likely
stems from the fact that, when it began, RAND focused the vast majority of its
resources on defense and national security research. In fact, RAND
researchers are credited with providing the foundations for America’s space
program.
Structure
of the RAND Corporation
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research
organization. In 2004, RAND reported $387 million in net assets and $227
million in revenues. Many influential personalities sit on RAND’s Board of
Trustees, including Paul H. O’Neill, the former United States Secretary of the
Treasury, and Harold Brown, a counselor with the influential Center for
Strategic and International Studies.
RAND is divided into several research divisions that cover
a wide range of topics, from health and education to national security, defense,
and issues of international concern. In addition, RAND operates a
publications division as well as a searchable public-use database service.
RAND and the Middle
East
The RAND Corporation operates the Center for Middle East
Public Policy (CMEPP), which focuses on “political, social, economic, and
technological developments” in the Middle East and aims “to make society safer,
smarter, and more prosperous.” The CMEPP lists four principle goals it
aims to achieve: supporting political and social reform; fostering mutual
understanding between the peoples of the Middle East and the United States;
encouraging the peaceful resolution of conflict in the region; and developing
programs to help the youth of the Middle East.
The director of the CMEPP is David Aaron, who previously
served as Deputy National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter and who
also served as a presidential emissary to different parts of the world. L.
Paul Bremer, the former head of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, and
Ray Mabus, the former American Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, serve on the CMEPP
advisory board.
The CMEPP lists five studies it is either currently working
or will begin work on in the near future. The most prominent of these
studies is entitled “Helping a Palestinian State Succeed.” The study seeks
to answer the question “what is required of a viable Palestinian state?” In two
reports published about the study, “Building a Successful Palestinian State” and
“The Arc: A Formal Structure for a Palestinian State,” the CMEPP offers
recommendations for the creation of viable and successful state structure.
According to their research, a Palestinian state will be more likely to succeed
if it has a high level of territorial integrity, open borders, and adequate
security both within the state and for its neighbors.
Other studies at the CMEPP include “Supporting Moderate
Muslim Networks,” a study that aims to provide help to moderate Muslim leaders
in fighting their “war of ideas” with extremists, and “Strengthening Middle East
and Islamic Studies in America,” which aims to examine the current state of
academic programs focusing on the Middle East and Islam and to provide both the
government and educational institutions with suggestions for improvements in
these programs. The Center is also working on a study called “The
Transition to Democracy in the Middle East,” which examines the dynamics and
challenges of encouraging reform in Middle Eastern countries of high national
interest to the United States, such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia, and a study
called “A Survival Kit for Child Victims of the War in Afghanistan and Iraq,”
which works to develop educational materials for children traumatized by the
wars in their countries.
RAND and Recent Controversial
Issues
RAND’s researchers and analysts often comment on issues of
significance with regard to the Middle East. Recently, RAND analysts have
offered their opinions on the United States’s relationship with Iran and its
involvement in Iraq.
With regard to Iran, James Dobbins of RAND suggested that
the United States needs to take a less hostile attitude toward the
country. He also suggested that the US could achieve more of its goals in
the region by working with Iran rather than against it, especially with regard
to the future of Iraq.
In terms of Iraq, RAND analysts remain optimistic about the
situation in the country, though they recognize the threat of a civil war if the
Iraqi population does not gain increased confidence in the Iraqi government and
if insurgent activities in Iraq do not lessen in number and intensity. At
the same time, RAND analysts say that the United States also needs to have a
specific set of criteria established that will eventually lead to a U.S. troop
withdrawal from the country.